Saving Fuel By Going Slow and Losing a Few Olives

The cost of airline travel is often high compared to other modes of transportation. Regardless of how airlines display ticket prices, the final cost is typically substantial.

Photo by Serge Taeymans on Unsplash


There are valid reasons for these high prices. The expenses associated with staffing, training, equipment, aircraft, and real estate contribute to the complexity and cost of air travel. Despite these drawbacks, most would agree that the benefits of air travel outweigh its expenses.

Fuel: A Major Expense for Airlines

One of the most significant costs for airlines is fuel. Much like gasoline prices at the pump, jet fuel prices can fluctuate widely, prompting airlines to seek innovative ways to minimize fuel consumption.

It’s important to note that airlines are required to carry enough fuel to reach their destination, proceed to an alternate airport if necessary, and hold additional reserves (30 minutes for jets, 45 minutes for non-jets). This requirement adds to operational costs and influences efficiency strategies.

Speed and Efficiency

Speed plays a crucial role in determining fuel consumption. Similar to driving a car, there are optimal speeds where aircraft operate most efficiently. Factors like aircraft weight, temperature, and pressure affect this efficiency. Few airlines operate at full speed since higher power settings lead to increased fuel burn. Some airlines incorporate flexibility into their procedures, allowing pilots to adjust speeds depending on schedules. However, finding the perfect balance is critical, as flying slower increases flight time, which can raise maintenance and staffing costs.

Real-World Examples of Savings (2008):

Flight Planning

Airlines strive to choose the most direct routes possible. However, the "routes" aircraft follow are often not straight lines due to air traffic control requirements and airspace constraints. Direct routes may not always be the most efficient when wind conditions are considered. For instance, avoiding headwinds by flying a slightly longer path can save fuel. Altitude also plays a role, as higher altitudes generally offer better fuel efficiency unless wind conditions dictate otherwise.

The Role of Technology

Technology significantly enhances fuel savings. Advanced software helps airlines plan optimal routes and speeds, while modern aircraft designs focus on reducing fuel consumption. Small modifications, like adding winglets, can further improve efficiency. Aircraft manufacturers often publish guidelines for operating their planes more efficiently.

Example:

Reducing Weight

Weight is another critical factor in fuel efficiency. Similar to cars, heavier aircraft require more energy to move. Advances in lightweight materials have led to lighter aircraft, reducing fuel consumption. Airlines have adopted various measures to save weight, from using smaller seats to embracing paperless flight decks. Digital tablets and smartphones now replace heavy manuals and documents for pilots and cabin crew. Even minor adjustments, like removing excess water from lavatories or reducing the use of paint, contribute to savings.

Examples:

The Bigger Picture

Lower operating costs generally translate into lower fares for travelers. These fuel-saving initiatives also reduce CO2 emissions, addressing environmental concerns that will become increasingly important for airlines in the future. Small changes, such as removing an olive or flying more efficiently, can make a significant difference in reducing costs and protecting the environment.

Sources:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Choosing an Alternate Aerodrome with a TAF (Canada)

Image
When filing an IFR flight plan in Canada, pilots are required to list an alternate aerodrome—a suitable airport other than the destination, in case landing at the destination becomes impossible. Photo by Ilyas Dautov on Unsplash Choosing an alternate involves careful consideration of: Location Available approaches Services offered Weather conditions If an aerodrome isn’t suitable as a destination, it likely isn't suitable as an alternate either. Not using a TAF? Learn more about alternate weather requirements using GFAs: Calculating Alternate Weather Requirements for Aerodromes with GFAs. Regulatory Requirements The Canadian Aviation Regulations (CARs) state: CAR 602.122  Except as otherwise authorized by the Minister in an air operator certificate or in a special authorization issued under subsection 604.05(2), no pilot-in-command shall operate an aircraft in IFR flight unless the IFR flight plan or IFR flight itinerary that has been filed for the flight under section 602.73 incl...
Read more

Understanding BECMG, TEMPO, and PROB in IFR Alternate Planning

Image
When filing an IFR flight plan in Canada, selecting a legal alternate isn't always as simple as checking the TAF for good weather. If a forecast includes BECMG, TEMPO, or PROB, those modifiers directly affect whether an airport qualifies as an alternate under the Canadian Aviation Regulations (CARs). Photo by John McArthur on Unsplash Here’s how each term works and what it means for your IFR alternate decision-making. Why Do Alternates Matter? Under CAR 602.122 , unless specific conditions are met, IFR flights must file an alternate aerodrome that has forecast weather above alternate minima during the ETA. However, forecasts using BECMG, TEMPO, or PROB must be interpreted according to specific rules outlined by Transport Canada, notably in the CAP GEN – IFR Alternate Aerodrome Weather Minima. ✈ BECMG (Becoming) BECMG indicates a gradual and permanent change expected to occur over the specified time frame. The change is not instantaneous but occurs progressively during the window. ...
Read more

Understanding Commercial Approach Ban for Canadian Operators

Image
Canada’s approach ban rules are more complex for commercial operations than for general aviation. This post aims to explain how to interpret the approach ban for commercial operators, both with and without an Operations Specification (ops spec). When you’re ready, try this interactive Commercial Approach Ban Quiz . Quick Review Commercial operators in Canada fall under Part VII of the Canadian Aviation Regulations (CARs). CAR 700.10 states that for an aircraft to conduct an approach, the required visibility must meet what is outlined in the Canadian Air Pilot (CAP). If the visibility for the intended runway is below the required value, the approach cannot be started or must be discontinued unless: The aircraft has passed the Final Approach Fix (FAF) inbound or is on the final approach course where there is no FAF. The aircraft is on a training flight, and the pilot-in-command (PIC) has informed air traffic control (ATC) that a missed approach will be conducted at or prior to the decisi...
Read more